Valued and resourced in manner that both reflects Australia’s changing strategic circumstances and lives up to our enduring moral obligations.
Defined in terms of poverty reduction, human development and progress toward the globally agreed 2030 Sustainable Development Goals and includes more ambitious climate change action.
Defined in terms of transformative change that expands civic space and elevates the voices, knowledge and solutions of marginalised people and communities.
A whole-of-society endeavour that reflects the perspectives and capabilities of our development partners, civil society, Indigenous communities, business, universities, and delivery agencies.
That in doing so:
- All forms of development finance, not only Official Development Assistance (ODA), must maximise human development impact and must be subject to the same high standards of effectiveness and inclusion, as well as transparency and accountability.
- Recognise that locally-led development cooperation and humanitarian action delivers the most appropriate and sustainable solutions.
- That attempts to restrict the vital advocacy voice of the not-for-profit and charity sector undermines Australia’s democratic credentials abroad and inhibits their legitimate role in communicating with the Australian people at home.
ACFID is calling for a legislated budget floor for ODA. To better deliver effective programs, the next Government needs to enhance development leadership and aid management capability, so that it better matches Australia’s strategic circumstances and delivers and demonstrates human development impact.
As part of the new policy, 10-year development partnerships with Australia’s Indo-Pacific partners should reflect shared goals and centre locally led approaches to development cooperation and humanitarian assistance.
Speaking earlier in April, ACFID’s CEO, Marc Purcell called for all parties to put ODA increases on a long-term footing.
“We need to return to investing 0.5 per cent of our income in development cooperation and humanitarian assistance. This was once a bipartisan commitment.
“The Greens have committed to 0.7 per cent by 2030, while Labour has vowed to reach 0.5 per cent. While we have welcomed the Coalition Government’s $1.5 billion in extra investment in recent years, it has not set out where it wants to take the international development budget. We need all parties to agree to 0.5 and a timetable to get there.
“That (0.5%) target should be enshrined in legislation so that we can sustain and deepen partnerships in the Pacific and Southeast Asia and provide our fair share to tackling shared global challenges like climate change. With an enshrined spend partner countries know where you stand and that you are in it for the long-haul. It's a principled commitment which over time delivers greater peace, stability and cooperation for Australians.”
ENDS
Further Information
For more information or to arrange interviews please call 0401 721 064 or email [email protected]
Notes to Editors
ACFID’s platform is generated from 9 policy briefs which set out the sector’s positions on core policy and program areas for the next Australian government and a new international development strategy:
- Elevating development to the heart of foreign policy
- Humanitarian assistance based on need
- Civil society as a cornerstone of effective and inclusive development
- Combatting the greatest threat to livelihoods, security and wellbeing
- Strong, responsive and resilient health systems in the Indo-Pacific
- Disability inclusion in the Australian aid program
- Strengthening Australia’s efforts to address gender inequality
- Breaking the intergenerational cycle of poverty
- Mobilising development finance for economic growth and social impact
The briefs are available at: https://acfid.asn.au/content/federal-election-2022