A woman in a brightly coloured scarf peers through coffee bean bushes on either side of her.

Annual Report 2022-23

Reporting on ACFID’s activities to ensure transparency and accountability


ACFID is the peak body for Australian NGOs involved in international development and humanitarian action.


ACFID works and engages with a range of strategic partners in addition to our members.


ACFID is governed by its Board, ACFID Council, and various expert and governance committees.


A line of ladies in colourful outfits cheer and dance joyously.

Conference 2023

disruptive dynamics, inspired ideas

18-19 October 2023

Meet our Members

The ACFID membership is comprised of Australian NGOs that actively work in the international aid and development sector.

Become a member

Joining ACFID means joining an experienced and powerful mix of like-minded organisations committed to good international development practice.

Membership types & fees

ACFID has two types of organisational membership: Full Membership and Affiliate Membership.

State of the Sector

The State of the Sector Report provides a comprehensive and robust analysis of the state of the Australian aid and development sector.

NGO Aid Map

ACFID’s NGO Aid Map allows the Australian public and stakeholders to explore the work of ACFID Members around the world.

Development Practice Committee

The DPC is an expert advisory group of development practitioners leading good practice within the sector.

Our Focus

Four men paint a colourful mural

Federal Budget 23-24 Analysis

Facts and figures on how aid is presented in this year’s annual budget

Strategic Plan

ACFID prioritises a robust response to climate change and pressure on civil society in developing countries, as well as other key priorities.

Emergency Aid

ACFID Members provide vital life-saving assistance in the immediate aftermath of an emergency.

Climate Change

Action on climate change is one of ACFID’s highest priorities, as it is an existential threat to humanity and our development.

Civil Society

Civil societies are a cornerstone of regional stability and ensure that the voices of the marginalised are heard.

Supporting NGOS

Supporting NGOs as Valuable Partners.

Inclusive & locally led development

Walking the talk on inclusive development.

Humanitarian Action

Taking humanitarian action for those in greatest need.

Elevating Development

Elevating Development to the Heart of Australia’s International Engagement.


Improving standards, practice and culture to prevent and respond to sexual exploitation, abuse and harassment.

Code of Conduct

A small girl stands in front of a multi-coloured finger paint artwork, with a blue paint covered hand

2022-23 ACFID Code of Conduct Review

The ACFID Code of Conduct is periodically reviewed to ensure it continues to reflect good practice and the needs of ACFID and its members.

Code of Conduct

The Code is a voluntary, self-regulatory industry code of good practice.

About the Code

Find out more about the Code of Conduct and how it operates.

Good Practice Toolkit

Overview and practical resources, and examples to support the implementation of the Code.

Spotlight on the Code

Provides a thematic ‘deep dive’ into each of the nine Quality Principles in the Code


This section outlines the responsibility to be taken by each Member to ensure compliance with the Code.

Complaints Handling

How to make a complaint and information on the Code’s independent mechanism to address concerns relating to an ACFID Members’ conduct.

Other Standards

Mapping the Code with other professional standards and principles in the humanitarian and aid sector in Australia and internationally

Home 5 News 5 ACFID Blog 5 What’s your state of accountability?

What’s your state of accountability?

Jan 23, 2020 | ACFID Blog


Jocelyn Condon presents at the Asia-Pacific regional partners’ meeting of the International Council of Voluntary Action (ICVA).

Reflections on the ICVA regional partners’ meeting

On 28 November 2019, ACFID’s Director of Development Effectiveness Jocelyn Condon, and Humanitarian Advisor Jen Clancy, presented a session on Civil Society Accountability to the Asia-Pacific regional partners’ meeting of the International Council of Voluntary Action (ICVA), which brings together humanitarian actors from across the Asia-Pacific region. We spoke with representatives at the conference about how their organisations are accountable, what this means, and how the Global Standard for CSO Accountability could improve the work of Civil Society Organisations worldwide.

Here’s some things we learnt along the way.

1. In the humanitarian context, accountability to affected populations has never been more important. We must prioritise creating space for this to happen.

If there’s one lesson that all our organisations have taken from the last few years, it’s how important it is to be accountable for the work that we do. This conversation is not new in the humanitarian space, and is formally driven through mechanisms such as the Core Humanitarian Standard, and the resolutions of the Grand Bargain, in particular stream 1 (greater transparency) and stream 6 (a participation revolution) (read more here).

Events of the #metoo era and scandals in the aid sector have left many in our sector feeling helpless in addressing the issues with our relief efforts. The tools employed in the Global Standard engage an organization in thinking about how to be an accountable and transparent organization at every opportunity and through every interaction with our stakeholders. We know it is not enough to simply have good intentions. What matters is how this translates to doing good in practice. The Grand Bargain reminds humanitarian organisations of the need to place the wishes of affected populations at the heart of a response. The Global Standard gives our organisations the practical tools we need to make sure this happens every time.

2. Arguably, for humanitarian organisations the most valuable thing about a Global Standard for CSO effectiveness is its relevance to all Civil Society actors engaging in a relief effort – be they international or domestic organisations.

The unique structure of the Global Standard and the different options for organisations to work with the standard offers a unique value proposition to the humanitarian response environment. Unlike pre-existing tools for accountability, the Global Standard puts all our organisations on a level playing field, setting out one framework of commitments and indicators to which all humanitarian responders can be held to account, and opening up the conversation for all organisations to be pro-active in defining and explaining what this would look like in their context. In the humanitarian sector, power differentials between large scale international response agencies and locally-led domestic organisations can often leave us feeling concerned about what it means to be truly accountable, and whether this is even possible. The Global Standard, however, enables organisations to both work on their own accountability, as well as to hold other organisations they interact with to account.

3. As humanitarian crises become increasingly protracted, using the Global Standard just makes sense

In a rapidly changing world that’s only just beginning to scratch the surface of the climate emergency, humanitarian work must also continuously adapt to the likelihood that our organisations will be working on a given response for much longer periods of time than ever before, and must become part of the ”fabric” of a country’s rebuilding. The time of “seasonal” extreme weather events happening in predictable patterns may well be behind us. Accordingly, we must abandon any assumption that humanitarian relief is a discrete intervention unrelated to the other work of civil society. As local organisations are increasingly taking on leadership roles in disaster relief operations, this is clearly no longer the case.

The Global Standard invites organisations to keep accountability and people-centred work front of mind right from the start and to keep it there, regardless of the exact type of work being undertaken, by whom or for how long. Using the Global Standard as a reference standard empowers our organisations to consider it a framework through which to customise and adopt a method accountability that is most relevant to the context of our work. Thus, the standard is relevant and important no matter the type of work a CSO undertakes, focusing on the organisation as the core point of accountability, and inviting our organisations to constantly adapt this accountability to be as effective in our work as we can.

ACFID is a partner to the Global Standard for CSO effectiveness, a global reference standard transforming civil society accountability. You can read more about ACFID’s partnership with the Global Standard hereRead more about the standard here.

Jocelyn Condon

Jocelyn Condon

Jocelyn Condon, Director of Development Effectiveness, ACFID

Jocelyn leads ACFID’s effectiveness and engagement team, which manages NGO membership, work under the ACFID Code of Conduct, and ACFID’s learning and innovation program. She has recently returned from four years in Timor-Leste where she worked with the International Labor Organisation, and is studying a masters of Development Policy at ANU. Prior to moving to Timor, Jocelyn worked as a Business Risk Consultant at Deloitte.